Top 10 (+1) Email Etiquette Pet Peeves

There are a few things about work-related emails which annoy me to the point of exasperation. (Undoubtedly I’m guilty of a few of these from time to time, I’m working on it)

1) Email signatures that do not include a contact phone number.
What if I want to reply to your email with a quick phone call from my office or better yet from my cell phone? If you fail to include your number I have to close the email, switch over to my contacts, search for your name, oops, realize you’re not in my contacts, search for your web address or use desktop search to find your number.  Arrggghh!!! You get the picture.

2) REPLY TO email signatures that do not include a contact phone number.
Same reasons as #1.

3) Sending a task oriented email primarily to one person but including others in the TO line rather than the CC line.
When you send a task oriented email to multiple people then you have essential assigned each of them a task to do. (e.g., “Where is the document reflecting our new pricing plan?”) So when there are multiple Type A personalities in the TO line then often times they will each reply to the email.  So little time in the day, why waste it like this? Send your emails to one person and CC the others when an FYI is needed.

4) Replying to an email with multiple people on the TO line but NOT selecting REPLY ALL.
If pet peeve #3 occurs and you have the answer then REPLY ALL so that others also do not spend time replying as well. For an exception to rule see pet peeve #5.

5) If the email is addressed to a group like “_EVERONE” then never, ever, hit REPLY ALL.
No explanation is needed, this one’s obvious. Special note: If some yahoo does REPLY ALL to the group address then please, please do not REPLY ALL again correcting them! I’ve seen this happen 100 times in a large company. Insanity.

6) Using Outlook’s Stationary or any sort of background image on your emails.
Again, no explanation needed.  This is so 80s.

7) Forgetting to send the attachment but then sending a new email with the just the attachment instead of replying to your original email.
If you send a new email with the missing attachment (and no other text) then I have to keep 2 emails so I know what is required of me to do with the attachment. We all forget to send attachments from time to time, just reply to
the original email with the missing attachment and a curt “Sorry”, we’ll know what to do from there.

8) Sending an attachment over 2MB.
No I’m not on dial-up but we all have corporate accounts with size limits on mail files. So all you’ve accomplished is cause the rest of my emails to bounce until I clean out this big one.

9) Replying to an email with the nothing but the words “Thanks” or “OK”.
This is equally annoying in Instant Messenger. I think I’m done with the conversation and “beep” a new email or IM msg comes across blinking “thanks”. It’s just one more interruption. I know you’re a nice person, I trust that you’re
thankful, let’s leave it at that.

10) CC-ing a peer or superior on an already existing email chain.
There aren’t too many legitimate reasons to do this other than to raise awareness to an issue and perhaps intimidate the other party. Try to work out your difference between yourselves first.

11) BONUS item. TYPING YOUR EMAILS IN ALL CAPS.

In case you haven’t used email since 1975 then I’ll let you in on a little secret, typing in ALL CAPS means that you’re SHOUTING!

These are just a few of the top ones that sprung to mind. Do you agree with the list? Are there other common ones that annoy you?

Curtis S

Keeping Kids Safe Online: Part 5 (Helpful Links)

In closing, here are a few links I've found helpful in my research:

God bless,

Curtis S

Keeping Kids Safe Online: Part 4 (Keystroke Logging)

In the previous blog I outlined a
number of top selling Content Filtering products and some of the things
I felt were flaws that diminished their effectiveness. In this blog
I'll explain what tool we did eventually select.

First, here's a
quick summary of some of the goals my wife and I established when
trying to balance my children's freedoms, ease of use, and practical
yet safe Internet usage. We wanted to:

  • Prevent
    access to inappropriate web content yet I didn't want to use an
    inherently flawed content filter nor attempt to pre-authorize each and
    every possible site my child might legitimately need to use for school
    work or for safe and fun entertainment.
  • Mentor,
    and monitor, our children on a safe way to use email, chat, and instant
    messenging tools as well as profiles on community sites.
  • Have
    a program that didn't require constant upgrades in order to monitor
    activity with every new instant messenging tool or community site our
    children might use.
  • Allow
    sufficient freedom that if our child understood the rules of safe
    Internet usage that they might be able to surf to new sites and
    interact with their friends online without us physically watching their
    every move.

After doing some research we settled on eBlaster from SpectorSoft. SpectorSoft offers several different eBlaster from SpectorSoft
programs / versions but the premise is the generally the same –
capture the user's activity either by logging every keystroke made by
the user or by taking screen captures at regular intervals. We selected
eBlaster because:

  • We could install it yet it was virtually impossible to detect on the computer or disable.
  • It
    captured each and every keystroke made by the person using the
    computer. And I mean everything. It doesn't matter what application the
    person is using it captures everything they type and places it into a
    very nice log file organized by user, time and the application they
    were using. So if they typed their username and password into their
    MySpace account we can see in the log that they typed the MySpace URL
    first, pressed enter and then typed in their username and password and
    pressed enter. Every action is captured.
  • It
    captures BOTH sides of the instant messenging chat sessions for
    Microsoft, Yahoo, AOL, Skype, and many others. We can see in the log
    the back and forth chatter labeled by their usernames from every
    individual in the chat session.
  • It can be configured to immediately forward any email sent from the PC to us.
  • It can be configured to immediately email us if certain keywords (naughty words or personal information) is ever typed.
  • It can be configured to email a summary and a detailed log of the previous day's activity to one or more email accounts.

It's
really been the best solution we've found so far. The first thing we
did was to tell our son that we installed the software and how it
worked. We never hid the fact that we were capturing everything he did
on the PC. We have always been completely open and honest about it. We
then explained our expectations and outlined our Internet safety rules. We left the PC in his bedroom and began to read the logs on a daily basis.

What
have we learned so far? Well despite the fact that he knew we were able
to read in the log his activity from the previous day he still
struggled to stay out of trouble.

SoapBox == ON I don't
care how much you love your child, how much you trust them, or how
perfect you think they are, or how honest you feel they are

Keeping Kids Safe Online: Part 3 (Content Filters)

As I previously mentioned,
I initially tried to allow my son some freedom by having an Internet
connected PC in his room. I thought I could properly monitor and
control his access using some of the popular Internet child safety
tools that are readily available and heavily marketed.

I tried Net Nanny, CYBSERSitter, and finally settled on Norton Family Edition.
Yet as you'll see none of them worked completely.  (Now granted I
haven't done a new evaluation in the past couple of years as to the
improvements made to these products but my search in prior years was
pretty exhaustive.)

Website Blocking / Content Filtering

The
first thing you're trying to prevent is having your child inadvertently
or on purpose visit websites they shouldn't (adult oriented sites,
blood and gore, etc.) These programs attempt to solve the problem a few
different ways.

Rating Systems like ICRA
are one attempt by the industry to control adult content. Web site
authors must include special tags/keywords on their website. The safety
programs then block access to any site with these tags. This places the
burden on the web site author and inherently doesn

Keeping Kids Safe Online: Part 2 (Statistics)

We moved into our current home about 7
years ago, my son had just turned 9 years old. Like any good IT person
would do I had an Internet connection installed in every room (this was
prior to great wireless solutions). Soon after I built a new PC for my
son and placed it in his room. I called it "Internet with a door",
meaning he could close the door while surfing. Now I realized this was
not ideal but I have a good kid and I HAD A PLAN (or so I thought). I
would install one of the many available Internet child safety programs
on his PC. Boy was I misguided as to their effectiveness and to my
son's resourcefulness! The tools were pretty much worthless and my kid
was much more clever than I thought.

Before I get into what did and did NOT work, here some facts about Internet usage (stats are from Enough.org and ProtectKids.com, of course most statistical data lags several years so it would be safe to assume the numbers are much higher):

Internet Usage

  • 93% of all Americans between 12 and 17 years old use the Internet
  • While
    adults still view e-mail as the must-have, "killer application" online,
    teens report that they view e-mail as something to use to talk to "old
    people

Page 6 of 7« First...«34567»